|Year : 2014 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 23-28
Effect of life-style modification on postmenopausal overweight and obese Indian women: A randomized controlled 24 weeks preliminary study
Vishal R Tandon1, Sudhaa Sharma2, Annil Mahajan3, Shagun Mahajan4
1 Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutic, Super-Specialty Hospital, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Super-Specialty Hospital, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India
3 Department of General Medicine, Super-Specialty Hospital, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India
4 Department of Nephrology, Super-Specialty Hospital, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India
|Date of Web Publication||24-Feb-2014|
Vishal R Tandon
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutic, Government Medical College, Jammu - 180 001, Jammu and Kashmir
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Aim: The aim of the following study is to evaluate the effect of life-style modification on postmenopausal (PM) overweight and obese Indian women in a randomized controlled 24 week study.
Materials and Methods: Two groups were formed Group I (n = 30) was designated as intervention (dietary and exercise group) and Group II (n = 24) served as control. Comparison of weight, waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI) were made and compared among two groups at 4, 8, 16 and 24 weeks.
Results: Mean age at menopause was 48.35 years versus 49.65 years; mean number of menopausal symptoms were 5.70 ± 1.76 versus 5.10 ± 1.56 and mean duration since menopause was 2.70 versus 2.90 years in Groups I and II respectively. When the effect of Group I and control on weight was compared at 4, 8, 16 and 24 weeks, there was no significant difference between them up to 8 week. At 8 weeks Group I caused a significant decrease in weight (P ≤ 0.05) when compared with control arm and which continued throughout the study period (P < 0.05) at both 16 and 24 weeks. Group I produced a significant reduction in WC from 8 weeks onwards up to 24 weeks (P ≤ 0.05). BMI was statistically significant in Group I and the effect started at 4 th week (P ≤ 0.05) and the differences in BMI reduction were highly significant at 16 th and 24 th weeks (P ≤ 0.001).
Conclusion: The results of the present study strongly recommend the life-style management to be incorporated in daily style of postmenopausal women under controlled supervision.
Keywords: Postmenopausal, obesity, overweight, life-style management
|How to cite this article:|
Tandon VR, Sharma S, Mahajan A, Mahajan S. Effect of life-style modification on postmenopausal overweight and obese Indian women: A randomized controlled 24 weeks preliminary study. J Mid-life Health 2014;5:23-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Tandon VR, Sharma S, Mahajan A, Mahajan S. Effect of life-style modification on postmenopausal overweight and obese Indian women: A randomized controlled 24 weeks preliminary study. J Mid-life Health [serial online] 2014 [cited 2021 May 12];5:23-8. Available from: https://www.jmidlifehealth.org/text.asp?2014/5/1/23/127787
| Introduction|| |
Obesity is a public health problem and is reaching epidemic proportions. This problem poses an enormous burden on health care systems and has lowered the quality of life of affected individuals substantially. World Health Organization's latest projections indicate that by 2015 approximately 2.3 billion adults will be overweight and 700 million will be obese.  Overweight individuals represent approximately 20% of the adult world population. Postmenopausal (PM) status is associated with higher prevalence of obesity, as 44% of postmenopausal women (PMW) are overweight, among whom 23% are obese.  PMW has an increased tendency for gaining weight. It is as yet unclear whether the menopausal transition itself leads to weight gain, but is known that the physiological withdrawal of estrogen brings about changes in fat distribution, together with physical inactivity, are probably the major causes of this phenomenon. 
Obesity is an independent risk factor for more severe menopausal symptoms. Women with abdominal obesity compared with other women have, high vasomotor scores, personal life dissatisfaction, nervousness, memory loss, depression, flatulence, muscle and joint pains, sleeping disorders lack of energy.  A sustained weight loss in obese patients has been shown to confer marked health benefits (metabolic and vascular) by various studies existing from western population. ,,, There is irrefutable evidence of the effectiveness of life-style management by regular physical activity and dietary management, in the primary and secondary prevention of several chronic diseases (e.g., cardiovascular disease [CVS], diabetes, cancer, hypertension, depression and osteoporosis) and premature death. ,,
Sibutramine and rimonabant were withdrawn from the market recently. Moreover, no convincing data exist recommending the use orlistat in PM obesity as such. Hence, presently life-style modification at the transition and during of menopause will go a long way in preventing weight gain and related complications during this metabolically vulnerable period.
There are only few studies ,,,,,, available from the western countries but no study is available from India to the best of our knowledge confirming the benefits of life-style management on weight reduction among PM Indian women.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This study was conducted in the Postgraduate Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, in a tertiary care teaching Medical College of India over a period of 1 year. The study was approved by Institutional Ethics Board. Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients after explaining them the nature and purpose of the study. A total of 96 women attending the outpatient department were enrolled in the study. Out of 96 patients, a total of 60 meeting the inclusion criteria were randomized into two groups equally. Thirty patients in Group I and 24 patients in Group II completed the study.
- Age: >45 years
- Sex: PM females
- Overweight: Body mass index (BMI): 25-29.9 kg/m 2
- Obese: BMI >30 kg/m 2.
- Cerebrovascular disease.
- CVS diseases such as ischemic heart disease and arrhythmias.
- Renal and hepatic disease.
- Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
- Thyroid disorder.
- Use of medications known to affect body weight, e.g., drugs acting on central nervous system, cathartics, thyroid supplements, diuretics and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
- A weight loss of 5 kg or more in preceding 6 months.
- Psychosocial contraindications such as bulimia nervosa, anorexia nervosa, substance abuse, clinically significant depression or under current psychiatric care.
Clinical evaluation with complete medical history, complete general physical examination and complete systemic examination was done. The following laboratory investigations were carried out at the time of screening:
- Hemoglobin, total leucocyte count, differential leucocyte count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
- Liver function tests.
- Renal function tests.
- Serum electrolytes (Na + , K + ).
- Electrocardiography, X-ray, urine routine examination.
- Weight, height, BMI, waist circumference (WC).
- Blood sugar (F), lipid profile (triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol), serum uric acid.
After screening all the patients were randomized into two groups with the help of the table of random numbers. Two groups were formed Group I was designated as the intervention group and Group II served as control. Each patient was followed-up for a period of 24 weeks. Both groups attended follow-up visits at 4, 8, 16 and 24 weeks of study.
Group I was advised life-style modification as follows:
Dietary interventions as per the diet chart prepared by dietician
Caloric restriction, consisting of 1300 kcal/day (25% total fat, 7% saturated fat, 100 mg of dietary cholesterol), eating calcium, flavonoid and antioxidant rich diet. They were encouraged intake of fiber, spinach, kale, cabbage, broccoli, tomatoes, beans, lentils, citrus fruits and a diet rich in phytoestrogens. All women were asked to avoid of fatty diet, sugars, salt, ghee, excess rice, potato and even honey.
Major recommendation was to exercise regularly, for at least 30-60 min on at least 5 days of the week or increased their physical activity expenditure (1000-1500 kcal/week). Controlled yoga and mind full exercises like meditation for 1 h on at least 5 days a week was compulsory. Any of the strength, resistance and stretching exercise training, aerobic such as walking, jogging, swimming, cycling, dancing, step ups and downs, brisk walking, lawn mowing were recommended to all. No fixed recommendations were made in the current study. The strict compliance to the study protocol was assured. The highly motivated known women regularly visiting to yoga center of Medical College, premises, after two brief educative awareness sessions were included in the interventional group.
Group II was treated as control and was allowed to undertake their routine activity and diet of their own choice.
Weight in kilograms was measured nearest to 0.1 kg (100 g) on insulin sensitivity index marked weighing machine with the subject ideally fasting, empty bladder, wearing only light clothing and without shoes. Height in meters was measured nearest to 1 mm.
BMI has been traditionally used to identify individuals who are most likely to be overweight and obese. It is calculated by dividing weight (in kg) by height (in m) squared: 
Body fatness in terms of BMI is classified as per consensus statement for diagnosis of obesity and metabolic syndrome for Asian Indian. 
WC is considered to be a better assessor of metabolic risk than BMI because it is more directly proportional to total body fat and amount of metabolically active visceral fat.  Normal WC measurements for men and women are ≤94 cm and ≤80 cm respectively. Metabolic risk is increased substantially if WC is ≥102 cm and ≥88 cm for males and females respectively. 
Similarly, WC was classified as per consensus statement for diagnosis of obesity and metabolic syndrome for Asian Indian.  For men: 90 cm and for women: 80 cm respectively to define obesity.
WC in inches was measured midway between the lower rib margin and iliac crest with a horizontal tape at the end of gentle expiration. 
Data was analyzed with the help of Computer Software Microsoft Excel Windows. Mean ± standard deviation were calculated for quantitative variables for both groups. Statistical comparison of all the parameters viz., weight, WC, BMI, was done by applying unpaired t-test for evaluation of intergroup significance and the intragroup significance was assessed using paired t-test. Minimum level of significance was taken as P < 0.05.
| Results|| |
The baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups [Table 1]. The results obtained after evaluating the effects of both groups on various parameters are as under:
Group I observed, reduced mean weight from 83.1 ± 7.64 kg at baseline to 80.2 ± 7.4 (-2.9 kg at 4 weeks, 73.2 ± 7.5 (-9.9 kg) at 8 weeks, 71.6 ± 6.46 (-11.5 kg) at 16 weeks and 71.2 ± 6.52 (-11.9 kg) at 24 weeks. The effect was found to be statistically significant at 4, 8, 16 and 24 weeks (P ≤ 0.001) when compared with baseline [Table 2].
|Table 2: Effect of life-style management on weight, WC and BMI (mean ± SD) in over weight and obese women (N = 30)|
Click here to view
Similarly in Group I, a significant decrease in WC from 4 th week onwards. There was a decrease from baseline score of 38.6 ± 2.33 inches to 37.3 ± 2.17 (-1.3 inches) with (P ≤ 0.001) at 4 weeks, 34.9 ± 2.02 (-3.7 inch) at 8 weeks (P ≤ 0.001), 34.56 ± 2.40 (4.04 inch) at 16 weeks and 34.02** ± 2.62 (-4.58) (P ≤ 0.001) at 24 weeks. Maximum decrease was seen at 24 weeks [Table 2].
Intervention - Group I showed a significant decrease in BMI from 4 th week. The decrease was observed from a mean baseline score of 30.6 ± 2.7 kg/m 2 to 29.5 ± 2.62 (-1.1 inch) at 4 weeks (P ≤ 0.001), 26.8 ± 2.5 (-3.8) at 8 weeks (P ≤ 0.001) 0, 26.3 ± 2.26 (-4) at 16 weeks (P ≤ 0.001) and 26.1 ± 2.61 (-4.5) at 24 weeks (P ≤ 0.001). Peak decrease was seen at 24 weeks [Table 2].
In the control arm, Group II mean weight reduced from baseline score of 80.6 ± 8.83 kg to 78.6 ± 9.06 (-2 kg), at 4 weeks, 77.2 ± 8.94 (-3.4 kg), 75.62 ± 8.87 (-4.98 kg) and 75.22 ± 6.88 (-5.38 kg), at the end of 4, 8, 16 and 24 weeks respectively [Table 3]. Mean WC at baseline was 38.6 ± 2.53 inches in the placebo arm. There was a decrease in WC to 37.7 ± 2.64 (-0.9 inches) at 4 weeks, 36.3 ± 3.45 (-2.3 inches) at 8 weeks, 35.91 ± 2.92 (-2.69 inches) at 16 weeks 35.24 ± 2.41 (-.3.36 inches) at the end of 24 weeks (P ≤ 0.001) [Table 3]. In the control arm BMI decreased from a mean 31.7 ± 3.25 kg/m 2 at baseline to 31.4 ± 3.69 (-0.3), 30.8 ± 3.3 (-1.09), 29.82 ± 3.206 (-1.88) and 29.58 ± 3.23 (-2.12) at 4, 8, 16 and 24 weeks [Table 3].
|Table 3: Effect of control on weight, WC and BMI (mean ± SD) in overweight and obese women (N = 24)|
Click here to view
When the effect of Group I (intervention group) and control on weight was compared at 4, 8, 16 and 24 weeks, there was no significant difference between them up to 8 week. At 8 weeks Group I caused a significant decrease in weight (P ≤ 0.05) when compared with the placebo arm and this significant difference in weight reduction continued throughout the study period (P < 0.05) at both 16 and 24 weeks. The maximum effect was seen at 24 weeks [Table 4]. On comparing the effect of Group I and control WC at 4, 8, 16 and 24 weeks, the Group I in a similar manner produced a significant reduction in WC from 8 week onwards up to 24 weeks (P ≤ 0.05). Maximum effect was seen at 24 th week [Table 4]. On comparing the effect on BMI, fall in BMI was statistically significant in Group I and the effect started at 4 th week (P ≤ 0.05) and the differences in BMI reduction were highly significant at 16 and 24 th week (P ≤ 0.001) [Table 4].
|Table 4: Comparative analysis of group I (N = 30) and group II (N = 24) on weight, WC and BMI in overweight and obese women|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Weight gain is a major health concern for women at midlife. Weight gain per se does not appear to be affected by the hormonal changes of the menopause. The fall in estrogen at menopause favors central abdominal fat accumulation. Other factors that may contribute to obesity in women include a low level of activity, parity, lower level of education, a family history of obesity, use of psychotropic drugs and chemotherapy. In addition to the adverse physical consequences of obesity, weight excess is a major risk factor for psychological distress, low self-esteem, depression and sexual dysfunction.  Successful maintenance of weight loss during menopause involves life-style change. The result of the current study is in full accordance with these recommendations. As on comparison life-style modification produced significantly more reduction in weight, WC and BMI.
Reductions in weight, BMI and abdominal circumference have been associated with a reduction in vasomotor symptoms in overweight and obese women.  The combination of dietary modification and exercise also has positive effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and psychological health, which may be greater than that from exercise or diet alone.  Improvements in weight, aerobic fitness and psychosocial factors may mediate some of the effects of these interventions on HRQoL.  Weight loss in overweight and obese women improves psychological well-being, HRQoL, self-esteem and health practices. , In addition, dietary weight loss and exercise exert a positive effect over insulin resistance in PMW, which together with a decrease in menopausal symptoms may potentially decrease cardiovascular risk. 
The results of these studies ,,,, are in accordance with our study as per beneficial effects of life- style modification is concerned on weight management of PMW, however the current study did not study the beneficial effects on various other parameters such as quality of life, symptom score and cardiovascular parameters.
Some of the recent studies ,, are also in accordance with the current study. Dietary weight loss and exercise has been shown to improve body measures and biomarkers of glucose metabolism and inflammation independent of antidepressant use in overweight or obese, PMW in a 12-month randomized controlled trial.  Similarly, caloric restriction, weight loss diet with or without exercise has been shown to reduce biomarkers of inflammation in PMW, with potential clinical significance for cancer risk reduction.  Positive changes in depression, stress and social support have been shown to independently associated with increased HRQoL, after adjusting for changes in weight and aerobic fitness exercise group among overweight/obese PMW.  Dietary weight loss, with or without exercise, significantly improved insulin resistance and older women have been shown to derive as much benefit as did the younger PMW in one of the recent study.  The results of the present study are in accordance to our study, however our study was only planned to see the benefits on weight, BMI and WC among PM obese/overweight Indian women.
Thus, physical exercise and dietary changes are absolutely essential in the treatment of obesity particularly when existing literature fails to recommends the use of drugs for the effective and safe management of PM obesity.
There are few limitations of the study. First, it is a short-term study with less number of patients and effect of small sample size cannot be ruled out on results of the study as power of the study was not calculated before resuming the current study. Thus, the highly encouraging results noticed in the current study need to be validated in larger Indian population. No biochemical markers, effects on menopausal symptoms, CVS parameters and impact on quality of life as a result of weight reduction were studied. Furthermore, highly motivated population included in the study retained these effects on long-term or not remains to be seen.
| Conclusion|| |
The results of the present study strongly recommend the life-style management to be incorporated in daily routine of PMW under the supervision and motivation/adherence to life-style management shall go a long way to avoid dual menace of obesity and its related complications.
| References|| |
|1.||WHO. Obesity and Overweight. WHO Fact sheet No. 311, 2006. Available from: http://www.whqlibdoc.who.int/fact_sheet/2006/FS_311.pdf. [Last accessed on 2013 Jul 13]. |
|2.||Lambrinoudaki I, Brincat M, Erel CT, Gambacciani M, Moen MH, Schenck-Gustafsson K, et al. EMAS position statement: Managing obese postmenopausal women. Maturitas 2010;66:323-6. |
|3.||Davis SR, Castelo-Branco C, Chedraui P, Lumsden MA, Nappi RE, Shah D, et al. Understanding weight gain at menopause. Climacteric 2012;15:419-29. |
|4.||Huang AJ, Subak LL, Wing R, West DS, Hernandez AL, Macer J, et al. An intensive behavioral weight loss intervention and hot flushes in women. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:1161-7. |
|5.||Imayama I, Alfano CM, Kong A, Foster-Schubert KE, Bain CE, Xiao L, et al. Dietary weight loss and exercise interventions effects on quality of life in overweight/obese postmenopausal women: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011;8:118. |
|6.||Rippe JM, Price JM, Hess SA, Kline G, DeMers KA, Damitz S, et al. Improved psychological well-being, quality of life, and health practices in moderately overweight women participating in a 12-week structured weight loss program. Obes Res 1998;6:208-18. |
|7.||García González F, Ferrer García JC, Baixauli Rubio A, Albalat Galera R, Elvira Macagno L, Pablos Abella C, et al. An ambulatory physical exercise program improves in the short term weight and quality of life of obese post-menopausal women. Med Clin (Barc) 2009;133:533-8. |
|8.||Simkin-Silverman LR, Wing RR, Boraz MA, Kuller LH. Lifestyle intervention can prevent weight gain during menopause: Results from a 5-year randomized clinical trial. Ann Behav Med 2003;26:212-20. |
|9.||Carroll S, Borkoles E, Polman R. Short-term effects of a non-dieting lifestyle intervention program on weight management, fitness, metabolic risk, and psychological well-being in obese premenopausal females with the metabolic syndrome. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2007;32:125-42. |
|10.||Kruk J. Physical activity in the prevention of the most frequent chronic diseases: An analysis of the recent evidence. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2007;8:325-38. |
|11.||Han TS, Sattar N, Lean M. ABC of obesity. Assessment of obesity and its clinical implications. BMJ 2006;333:695-8. |
|12.||Misra A, Chowbey P, Makkar BM, Vikram NK, Wasir JS, Chadha D, et al. Consensus statement for diagnosis of obesity, abdominal obesity and the metabolic syndrome for Asian Indians and recommendations for physical activity, medical and surgical management. J Assoc Physicians India 2009;57:163-70. |
|13.||Haslam D, Sattar N, Lean M. ABC of obesity. Obesity - Time to wake up. BMJ 2006;333:640-2. |
|14.||Lyznicki JM, Young DC, Riggs JA, Davis RM, Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association. Obesity: Assessment and management in primary care. Am Fam Physician 2001;63:2185-96. |
|15.||Imayama I, Alfano CM, Mason C, Wang C, Duggan C, Campbell KL, et al. Weight and metabolic effects of dietary weight loss and exercise interventions in postmenopausal antidepressant medication users and non-users: A randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 2013;57:525-32. |
|16.||Imayama I, Ulrich CM, Alfano CM, Wang C, Xiao L, Wener MH, et al. Effects of a caloric restriction weight loss diet and exercise on inflammatory biomarkers in overweight/obese postmenopausal women: A randomized controlled trial. Cancer Res 2012;72:2314-26. |
|17.||Mason C, Foster-Schubert KE, Imayama I, Kong A, Xiao L, Bain C, et al. Dietary weight loss and exercise effects on insulin resistance in postmenopausal women. Am J Prev Med 2011;41:366-75. |
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]