Journal of Mid-life Health Journal of Mid-life Health
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions | Online submission | Subscribe | Advertise Users Online: 480  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 




 
 Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 219-224  

Atypical manifestations of women presenting with myocardial infarction at Tertiary Health Care Center: An analytical study


1 Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, College of Nursing, JIPMER and Department of Cardiology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India
2 Department of Cardiology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India

Date of Submission10-Feb-2020
Date of Decision30-Jan-2021
Date of Acceptance30-Aug-2021
Date of Web Publication16-Oct-2021

Correspondence Address:
Lakshmi Ramamoorthy
JIPMER, Puducherry
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jmh.JMH_20_20

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Introduction: Typical chest pain symptoms are the cause that requires individuals to seek out medical care in Acute coronary syndrome(ACS). Evidence suggests, symptoms labelled as 'atypical 'is more common in women with ACS. The present study focuses on the need for the implementation of a gender specific approach in the current scenario by identifying gender based differences that exist in clinical presentations of the patients with ACS. Early identification of women's prodromal and acute symptoms of Myocardial Infarction is an important step in provision of appropriate treatment modality. Present study focus on need for implementation of gender-specific approach in current scenario by identifying gender based differences that exist in risk factors, clinical manifestations in patients presenting with MI. Methodology: Cross- sectional analytical study was conducted among 240 Participants (120 males and 120 females). Both men and women diagnosed with MI, who survived, stabilized after admission was included in the study. Consecutive sampling technique was used to select the participants. Data was collected on risk factors profile, clinical manifestations by administering structured questionnaire. Results: Risk factors such as history of diabetes, history of dyslipidemia was found to be homogenous among both men and women. 60% of men were ever smokers. Hypertension and known IHD was noted to be significant in women (p<0.002, p <0.001) but men presented with higher BMI (p<0.030). Females increasingly presented with atypical presentations when compared to males (p<0.005). Women commonly had squeezing and tightness type of pain and men reported tightness, burning, pricking type of pain (p<0.003). The majority of the women reported the onset of pain occurrence between 6am to 12 pm(p<0.004), whereas men significantly reported the onset of pain between 12 am -6 am(p<0.001). Conclusion: Gender based differences in risk factors and clinical presentation in men and women with myocardial infarction had been a focus in researches that emphasized need for focused assessment for women as they increasingly presents with atypical symptoms. The current study also supports the need of a gender specific approach to avoid delay in diagnosis and care of them.

Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome, clinical manifestations, gender differences in MI, myocardial infarction, risk factor


How to cite this article:
Joseph NM, Ramamoorthy L, Satheesh S. Atypical manifestations of women presenting with myocardial infarction at Tertiary Health Care Center: An analytical study. J Mid-life Health 2021;12:219-24

How to cite this URL:
Joseph NM, Ramamoorthy L, Satheesh S. Atypical manifestations of women presenting with myocardial infarction at Tertiary Health Care Center: An analytical study. J Mid-life Health [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 3];12:219-24. Available from: https://www.jmidlifehealth.org/text.asp?2021/12/3/219/328379




   Introduction Top


Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a major threat to the living society as its growth is devastating since decades. Primarily, these diseases occur due to interaction of many risk factors that are associated with an individual and modification of lifestyle plays an important role in improving heart disease.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) develops as a result of plaque deposition within coronary arteries. Formation of blood clot can result due to rupture of plaque causing ischemic changes in myocardium.[1] Myocardial infarction (MI) occurs as result of prolonged myocardial cell ischemia with involvement of myocardial necrosis. The statistics revealed by the WHO showed an estimation of 17.5 million people died with the cause of CVD, which constitutes about 31% of all global deaths, and cardiac diseases will be leading causes of disability.[2],[3],[4]

Several studies have been conducted in analyzing the epidemiology and case fatality of MI to identify the declining trends of mortality in CVD.[5] Evidence shows sex-specific patterns and a diverged trend in the incidence of MI with an increased incidence in women and elderly. The cardiovascular disease has perceived to be primarily concerned with men. However, mortality and morbidity of this disease are taking a leading role in women who constitute about 48% of Indian population. Women mostly present with atypical presentations, and higher index of suspicion is required while evaluating women with MI.[6],[7],[8]


   Methodology Top


Cross-sectional analytical study was done among 120 males and 120 females who were admitted with MI in a tertiary care center in south India for the period of 1 year to identify difference in clinical presentation of patients with MI between men and women.

Typical chest pain is defined as sensation of pain in chest, mostly in the retrosternal region with nature of either squeezing, pressing, tightness, burning, heaviness which is radiating to neck, shoulder, and left arm. Other than these symptoms such as dizziness, sweating, shortness of breath, vomiting, palpitation, fainting, back pain, and fatigue was considered as atypical chest pain in this study.

Sample size was calculated in “n master 2.0” by using proportion of atypical clinical features in male and female as 29% and 42%, and considering finite population of MI patients in our settings during study period to be 250, and relative precision of 20%, with power as 80%, it was calculated to be sample size of 120 in each arm including 5% attrition.

Inclusion criteria were both men and women diagnosed with MI, who survived and stabilized. Consecutive sampling technique was used to select the participants. Structured questionnaire was developed as data collection tool. The tool consisted section A which included sociodemographic data, section B included risk factor survey including body mass index (BMI), blood pressure (BP), nature of work, family history of CAD, level of physical exercise, dietary pattern. history of smoking and alcoholism, comorbid illness. Section C included clinical presentation survey deals with description of pain, intensity of pain, location of pain, nature of pain, history of atypical presentation, time and circumstance of onset of pain. Permission was obtained from the Institute ethical committee, human studies, Reg. No: JIP/IEC/2016/1110. Ethical issues involved in the study were less than minimal risk. Informed consent was obtained from every participant after a brief explanation regarding the study by the investigator.

Statistical analysis

To compare the means of BP and weight, independent sample t-test was used. Chi-square/Fisher's exact test was used to compare the clinical characteristics, risk factors profile, location/nature of pain, and comparison of atypical manifestations. Mann–Whitney U-test was used for comparison of description of pain among men and women with MI.


   Results Top


The mean age of the participants was 54 versus 56 years among men and women. Groups were comparable in both systolic and diastolic pressure mean values. The male gender preponderance was noted in regard to higher BMI when compared to women (P < 0.030). Sedentary lifestyle pattern was prominent in women when compared to men which was significant at P < 0.000. The groups were found to be homogenous in other factors including family history of CAD, exercise pattern, dietary history, and previous history of MI [Table 1].
Table 1: Clinical characteristics

Click here to view


History of percutaneous coronary intervention, history of diabetes, and history of dyslipidemia were found to be homogenous among both men and women. Sixty percent of men were ever smokers. With regard to hypertension as comorbidity, there was increased frequency noted in women (P < 0.002). Furthermore, known ischemic heart disease was observed as comorbidity among women than men (P < 0.001). Further, 78.3% of female participants have attained menopause. Seventeen had hypertensive disorder during pregnancy, among them 70.6% had taken treatment regimen for hypertensive disorders [Table 2].
Table 2: Risk factor profile in both genders

Click here to view


Location of pain during MI did not vary among men and women including typical symptom of retrosternal pain radiating down left arm (23.7% vs. 24.3%). Although no statistical significance was noted in relation to atypical symptom between the groups, the increased frequency of pain was noted in the upper chest and intrascapular region among women (12.6% vs. 4.4%) [Table 3].
Table 3: Comparison of location of pain among both genders with myocardial infarction

Click here to view


The onset of pain was very abrupt for both men and women. Constant mild chest pain was predominantly reported by men when compared to women, 28.3% versus 15% (P < 0.011). About 85% of females were presented with atypical manifestations such as dizziness, sweating, shortness of breath, vomiting, palpitation, fainting, back pain, and fatigue (P < 0.005) compared to 70% in men (P < 0.005) [Table 4].
Table 4: Comparison of description of pain among men and women with myocardial infarction (n=240)

Click here to view


The groups were comparable in the perception of severe pain. However, women had more perception of moderate pain, whereas men had more perception of mild pain and overall, it was statistically significant at P < 0.032 [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Comparison of intensity of pain among men and women with myocardial infarction # Mann–Whitney U-test, *P < 0.05. Numerical pain scale (scoring: 1–3 mild pain, 4–6 moderate pain, 7–10 severe pain)

Click here to view


Majority of women reported the onset of pain occurrence between 6 am and 12 pm (P < 0.004), whereas men significantly reported the onset of pain during 12 am to 6 am (P < 0.001). Women commonly had squeezing (23.2%) and tightness (40.4%) type of pain whereas men reported tightness (42.6%), burning (34.8%), pricking (4.5%) type of pain which was statistically significant at P < 0.003 [Figure 2] and [Figure 3].
Figure 2: Comparison of nature of pain among men and women with

Click here to view
Figure 3: Comparison of time of onset of pain among men and women with myocardial infarction

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Age distribution in the current study shows that the mean age of women is higher than men, however, there was no statistical significance in age distribution in both genders (P < 0.10). This distribution was comparable to findings of a European study where women had presentation of MI in later stage of life.[8] Duraes et al. had similar findings which showed that the mean age of women was higher compared to men, 60.5 years versus 56.3 years, respectively. The later presentation of MI among women is possibly due to the effect of protective hormone, estrogen in premenopausal stage which slows the progression of atherosclerosis.[9],[10],[11]

The current study shows that mean systolic and diastolic BP is higher among female participants when compared to men but was found statistically nonsignificant. Similar findings reported by Butala et al. showed that mean systolic BP among women was 134.1 and among men was 130.6 (P < 0.091).[12] Several contradicting studies reported gender-specific association of higher mean BP among women compared to men. The rising pattern of mean BP among female is assumed to be due to declining estrogen in postmenopausal stage.[13],[14]

The present study findings reported higher BMI among males. In contrast to this, numerous studies showed similarity in BMI distribution among men and women.[12],[14] The contradicting study findings in regard to BMI distribution may be possibly due to heterogeneity among population in terms of lifestyle, socioeconomic status, and dietary patterns.[15] Hypertension was significantly noted in women (P < 0.002). Many previous studies had consistent results showing hypertension as a major risk factor among women.[16],[17],[18]

The study findings show that predominant symptom exhibited by men and women is chest pain. When compared to men, females increasingly presented with atypical presentations such as dyspnea, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, sweating, and back pain (P < 0.005). In contrast to these findings, Berg et al. reported no significance in atypical presentations such as dyspnea, fatigue, neck pain, and vomiting but showed significant prevalence of nausea, back pain, dizziness, and palpitation among women.[19]

The present study did not find any gender-specific association in location of pain but shows higher presentation of females with intrascapular pain, this is contrast to earlier results which suggested increased pain in the right upper chest, sternum, and left side of chest in men whereas in women frequently reported pain in jaw, neck, throat, shoulder, left scapula had more frequency pain among men.[20],[21]

Women commonly had squeezing and tightness type of pain whereas men reported tightness, burning, pricking type of pain which was significant at P < 0.003. In consistent to the current findings, male presentation of burning type of pain was reported by Bösner et al.[22]

The present study shows that majority of men had presented with STEMI (P < 0.004). Several studies reported similar findings of the current study, showing higher prevalence of STEMI among men when compared to women.[22],[23],[24],[25],[26]


   Conclusion Top


The current study supports the need of a gender-specific approach in treatment and nursing care of the patients with MI, as the study revealed differences in presentation of MI that leads to the use of over-the-counter drugs and hospitalization delays. An insight to the public has to be made as disparities still exist in the treatment delay even though a complex health-care sector has evolved. This study can be a future reference since primary care physicians should be empowered about these differences so that they can refer the patients in time and the awareness that has to be made into the outskirts of the public regarding the disease presentations so that the treatment delays can be solved to an extent.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
What is Coronary Heart Disease – NIH Health CAD. [USA]; June 2016. Available from: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/ healthtopics/topics/cad. [Last accessed on 2020 Jan 16].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Mendis S, Thygesen K, Kuulasmaa K, Giampaoli S, Mähönen M, Ngu Blackett K, et al. World Health Organization definition of myocardial infarction: 2008-09 revision. Int J Epidemiol 2011;40:139-46.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Non Communicable Disease. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. Available from: http://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd_ statusreport_2014/en. [Last accessed on 2020 Jan 16].  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Maskey A, Sayami A, Pandey MR. Coronary artery disease: An emerging epidemic in Nepal. J Nepal Med Assoc 2003;42:122-24.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Roger VL. Epidemiology of myocardial infarction. Med Clin North Am 2007;91:537-52.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Roger VL, Jacobsen SJ, Weston SA, Goraya TY, Killian J, Reeder GS, et al. Trends in the incidence and survival of patients with hospitalized myocardial infarction, Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1979 to 1994. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:341-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Alpert JS, Dalen JE. Recent changes in attack and survival rates of acute myocardial infarction (1975 through 1981). The Worcester heart attack study. JAMA 1986;255:2774-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Gobwald A, Schienkiewitz A, Nowossadeck E, Busch MA. Prevalence of myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease in adults aged 40-79 years in Germany: Results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2013;56:650-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Duraes AR, Bitar YS, Freitas AC, Filho IM, Freitas BC, Fernandez AM. Gender differences in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) time delays: Experience of a public health service in Salvador-Brazil. Am J Cardiovasc Dis 2017;7:102-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Malik FT, Klimuddin M, Ahmed N, Badiuzzaman M, Ahmed MN, Dutta A, et al. AMI in very young (aged ≤ 35yrs) Bangladeshi patients: Risk factors and coronary angiographic profile. Clin Trials Regul Sci Cardiol 2016;13:1-5.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Maas AH, Appelman YE. Gender differences in coronary heart disease. Neth Heart J 2010;18:598-602.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Butala NM, Desai MM, Linnander EL, Wong YR, Mikhail DG, Ott LS, et al. Gender differences in presentation, management, and in-hospital outcomes for patients with AMI in a lower-middle income country: Evidence from Egypt. PLoS One 2011;6:e25904.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Njølstad I, Arnesen E, Lund-Larsen PG. Smoking, serum lipids, blood pressure, and sex differences in myocardial infarction. A 12-year follow-up of the Finnmark Study. Circulation 1996;93:450-6.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Albrektsen G, Heuch I, Løchen ML, Thelle DS, Wilsgaard T, Njølstad I, et al. Risk of incident myocardial infarction by gender: Interactions with serum lipids, blood pressure and smoking. The Tromsø Study 1979-2012. Atherosclerosis 2017;261:52-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Mungreiphy NK, Dhall M, Tyagi R, Saluja K, Kumar A, Tungdim MG, et al. Ethnicity, obesity and health pattern among Indian population. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2012;3:52-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Bucholz EM, Strait KM, Dreyer RP, Lindau ST, D'Onofrio G, Geda M, et al. Editor's choice-sex differences in young patients with acute myocardial infarction: A VIRGO study analysis. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2017;6:610-22.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Cho KI, Shin ES, Ann SH, Garg S, Her AY, Kim JS, et al. Gender differences in risk factors and clinical outcomes in young patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Epidemiol Community Health 2016;70:1057-64.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Lichtman JH, Leifheit EC, Safdar B, Bao H, Krumholz HM, Lorenze NP, et al. Sex differences in the presentation and perception of symptoms among young patients with myocardial infarction: Evidence from the VIRGO study (Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI Patients). Circulation 2018;137:781-90.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Berg J, Björck L, Dudas K, Lappas G, Rosengren A. Symptoms of a first acute myocardial infarction in women and men. Gend Med 2009;6:454-62.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Khan JJ, Albarran JW, Lopez V, Chair SY. Gender differences on chest pain perception associated with acute myocardial infarction in Chinese patients: A questionnaire survey. J Clin Nurs 2010;19:2720-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
DeVon HA, Ryan CJ, Ochs AL, Shapiro M. Symptoms across the continuum of acute coronary syndromes: Differences between women and men. Am J Crit Care 2008;17:14-24.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Bösner S, Haasenritter J, Hani MA, Keller H, Sönnichsen AC, Karatolios K, et al. Gender differences in presentation and diagnosis of chest pain in primary care. BMC Fam Pract 2009;10:79.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Prescott E, Hippe M, Schnohr P, Hein HO, Vestbo J. Smoking and risk of myocardial infarction in women and men: Longitudinal population study. BMJ 1998;316:1043-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Moshki M, Zareie M, Hashemizadeh H. Sex differences in acute myocardial infarction. Nurs Midwifery Stud 2015;4:e22395.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
George L, Ramamoorthy L, Satheesh S, Saya RP, Subrahmanyam DK. Prehospital delay and time to reperfusion therapy in ST elevation myocardial infarction. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2017;10:64-9.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
26.
Attard R, Dingli P, Doggen CJM, Cassar K, Farrugia R, Wettinger SB. The impact of passive and active smoking on inflammation, lipid profile and the risk of myocardial infarction. Open Heart 2017;4:e000620. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000620.  Back to cited text no. 26
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Methodology
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed322    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded38    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal