Journal of Mid-life Health Journal of Mid-life Health
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions | Online submission | Subscribe | Advertise Users Online: 3108  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 




 
 Table of Contents 
PICTORIAL REVIEW
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 310-315  

Endometrium at menopause: The pathologist's view


Department of Histopathology, Apollo Health City, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Date of Submission19-Dec-2021
Date of Decision24-Dec-2021
Date of Acceptance28-Dec-2021
Date of Web Publication20-Jan-2022

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Meenakshi Swain
Department of Histopathology, 6th Floor, Health Street Building, Apollo Health City, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 089, Telangana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jmh.jmh_218_21

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Endometrium at menopause is inactive and free of cyclical changes that are characteristics of the reproductive age. At the same time, menopausal endometrium is subject to a variety of disease processes, the most sinister of which are the endometrial malignancies. In the present pictorial review, we briefly discuss the various morphologic patterns of diseases affecting the menopausal endometrium. With an aim to provide insights from the pathologists' point of view, multiple pictures for each of the disorders are shared. We highlight the finer points a pathologist looks for, to ensure proper treatment and welfare of postmenopausal women.

Keywords: Atrophy, endometrial malignancies, endometrium, menopause


How to cite this article:
Swain M, Kulkarni AD. Endometrium at menopause: The pathologist's view. J Mid-life Health 2021;12:310-5

How to cite this URL:
Swain M, Kulkarni AD. Endometrium at menopause: The pathologist's view. J Mid-life Health [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 May 18];12:310-5. Available from: https://www.jmidlifehealth.org/text.asp?2021/12/4/310/336152




   Introduction Top


Endometrium undergoes cyclical modifications under hormonal influence during reproductive life. While the endometrium normally atrophies and remains inactive after menopause, a plethora of disorders affect the endometrium at this stage. In this pictorial review, we highlight these morphologic aspects.


   Embryology and Anatomy Top


Endometrium is formed secondary to fusion of the Müllerian (paramesonephric) ducts between the 8th and 9th postovulatory weeks. After the 20th week, the surface epithelium invaginates into the underlying stroma, forming glandular structures that extend toward the underlying myometrium. At birth, the endometrium measures less than 0.5 mm in thickness, and the surface and glands are lined by a low columnar-to-cuboidal epithelium devoid of either proliferative or secretory activity, which resembles the inactive endometrium of postmenopausal women.[1]

The endometrium during the reproductive period undergoes cyclical morphologic changes, which are particularly evident in the superficial two-thirds, the functionalis layer. Morphologic alterations are minimal in the deeper one-third, the basalis layer [Figure 1].[2]
Figure 1: Layers of the endometrium. The stratum functionalis occupies the upper two-thirds and is showing secretory phase appearance in this photomicrograph (yellow arrow). The lower one-third of the stratum basalis shows tubular glands with minimal morphologic alterations (blue arrow). The underlying myometrium (red arrow) shows fascicles of smooth muscle (HE stain, ×5)

Click here to view



   Proliferative Phase Top


An understanding of the normal proliferative phase endometrium is essential to appreciate menopausal and atypical changes. In the proliferative phase, the endometrial glands are uniform, and evenly spaced, and appear tubular on cross-section [Figure 2]a. An occasional mildly dilated gland is a normal feature and of no significance. Mitotic figures are easily identified within the glands [Figure 2]b and are necessary to label an endometrium as proliferative. The glandular epithelium is composed of pseudostratified cuboidal or low columnar cells with moderate, basophilic cytoplasm and ovoid nuclei, sometimes showing small nucleoli.[3]
Figure 2: (a) Proliferative phase endometrium composed of evenly spaced tubular glands (red arrow), with compact, cellular surrounding stroma (HE stain, ×5). (b) Glands showing mitoses (blue arrow) help differentiate from inactive atrophic glands (HE stain, ×20)

Click here to view



   Disordered Proliferative Endometrium Top


Focally evident cystically dilated glands with intervening tubular proliferative phase glands are characteristics of disordered proliferative endometrium [Figure 3]. Disordered proliferation is a pattern that is neither normal nor diffusely hyperplastic, resulting from sustained estrogenic stimulation.[4]
Figure 3: Disordered proliferative endometrium characterized by few dilated and cystic (red arrow) glands amid tubular proliferative phase glands (blue arrow) (HE stain, ×10)

Click here to view



   Atrophy Top


Atrophy is an important cause of abnormal and recurrent uterine bleeding in postmenopausal patients, found in 25%–48% or more of menopausal women coming for a biopsy.[4],[5]

In the absence of an estrogenic drive, the endometrium is thin on gross examination [Figure 4]a. The functionalis is absent, and only a basalis layer, similar to the basalis of the reproductive years and of the premenarchal endometrium [Figure 4]b, is seen.
Figure 4: (a) Gross photograph of a cut-opened postmenopausal uterus showing a thinned-out atrophic endometrium (red arrow). (b) Photomicrograph showing inactive glands (yellow arrows) lacking mitoses with surrounding spindle-celled stroma (HE stain, ×5). (c) Photomicrograph of an endometrial biopsy showing strips and fragments of endometrial glands and stroma consistent with atrophic endometrium (HE stain, ×5)

Click here to view


Biopsy specimens are characteristically scanty, showing only fragmented wisps and detached strips of cuboidal to low columnar epithelium [Figure 4]c, along with compact stromal balls. This paucity of tissue does not represent an “insufficient” sample as the scant tissue may be all that is present and therefore is completely representative of the lining of the uterine cavity.[4]


   Postmenopausal Endometrium Top


The histological appearance of the postmenopausal endometrium is variable. The endometrium is usually thin, and this is best appreciated in hysterectomy or endometrial resection specimens [Figure 5]a. The glands vary from small, widely spaced atrophic tubules to cystically dilated glands throughout, an appearance called cystic atrophy or senile cystic atrophy [Figure 5]b. A mixture of small tubules and cystically dilated glands may occur. An absence of proliferative and mitotic activity [Figure 4]b distinguishes it from proliferative endometrium.[1] This cystic change may not be observed in endometrial biopsies because tissue fragmentation during the procedure disrupts the glands, imparting the characteristic appearance described above.
Figure 5: (a) Atrophic endometrium from a hysterectomy showing thinned out endometrium with atrophic, tubular glands (blue arrow) and a fibrous stroma (red arrow) (HE stain, ×10). (b) A case of senile cystic atrophy with cystic glands (yellow arrow) lined by cuboidal cells (HE stain, ×10)

Click here to view


The stroma may be densely cellular and composed of ovoid-to-spindle–shaped cells [Figure 4]b or more fibrous appearance than in premenopausal women [Figure 5]a. This fibrous change may be the direct cause of the cystic change because of blockage of the glands [Figure 5]b.

Postmenopausal endometria are similar to those of atrophic endometrium due to other causes, such as exogenous hormones, premature ovarian failure, or radiotherapy.


   Endometrial Polyps Top


Endometrial polyps have been identified in between 2% and 23% of patients undergoing endometrial biopsy for abnormal uterine bleeding and are more common in the postmenopausal age group.[6] They are thought to be related to hyperestrogenism, possibly originating as localized hyperplasia of the endometrial basalis, secondary to hormonal influences. The stromal component is clonal and shows genetic alterations such as 6p21–22 rearrangements. The glands are polyclonal and appear to be induced through as yet undefined stromal–epithelial interactions.[7],[8]

Tamoxifen is also associated with an increased risk of the development of endometrial polyps. Tamoxifen-related polyps may be multiple and large.[7] Histologically, these are indistinguishable from the other common polyps. Some may have staghorn glands with periglandular stromal condensation but lack mitoses, unlike the stroma of adenosarcoma.[8]

Gross examination shows polypoidal outgrowths in the endometrial cavity [Figure 6]a. On histomorphology, the polyps are characterized by a smooth outer contour with epithelium lining the surface on all three sides [Figure 6]b, and architecturally abnormal, cystically dilated, and branching glands set in a typically fibrous and sometimes hyalinized stroma showing collections of thick-walled stromal vessels [Figure 6]c. Both glands and stroma must appear different than the nonpolypoidal, uninvolved endometrium.
Figure 6: (a) Gross photograph of a cut-opened uterus with a fundal polyp. (b) Photomicrograph of the polyp showing a rounded contour lined by a surface epithelium (blue arrow) and tubular and cystic glands (black arrow) in a fibrous stroma (HE stain, ×5). (c) Stroma with a leash of thick-walled vessels (green arrows) (HE stain, ×10)

Click here to view



   Adenomyomatous Polyps Top


These polyps show similar glands [Figure 7]a but have smooth muscle in their stroma, usually as irregular bundles and strands in proximity to thick-walled vessels [Figure 7]b.[9] Although smooth muscle is present, the glands are invested by stroma, sometimes resembling a focus of adenomyosis. These polyps usually have proliferative/hyperplastic or functional gland pattern.
Figure 7: (a) Adenomyomatous polyp showing dilated and tubular endometrial glands with surrounding smooth muscle (HE stain, ×5). (b) Smooth muscle (green arrows)-rich stroma in an adenomyomatous polyp (HE stain, ×10)

Click here to view



   Endometrial Hyperplasia Top


Endometrial hyperplasia is defined as a proliferation of glands of irregular size and shape with an associated increase in the gland/stroma ratio compared with proliferative endometrium.

In 1994 and 2003, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Society of Gynecologic Pathologists promoted a system for endometrial hyperplasia classification, which subdivided hyperplasia into four groups according to their nuclear alterations (atypia vs. without atypia) and degree of architectural crowding defined by the extent of back-to-back glandular crowding (complex vs. simple). Although this approach to endometrial hyperplasia diagnosis was better, subsequent studies showed poor-to-moderate interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.337–0.60).[10],[11] Accordingly, the 2014 WHO Classification of Female Genital Tumours (4th edition) simplified the four-tier system into two groups based on the presence of atypia while ignoring the extent of glandular crowding.[12]

Endometrial hyperplasia (WHO 2020) is now subdivided into two broad categories:

  1. Endometrial hyperplasia without atypia
  2. Endometrial atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia (EAH/EIN).


Endometrial hyperplasia without atypia

This is characterized by an increased gland/stroma ratio and a variety of abnormal architectural patterns. Glands typically vary in size and shape. Dilatation and outpouching of glandular epithelium characterize the architectural abnormalities [Figure 8]a. In other instances, the glands are only minimally dilated but focally crowded. Increased gland-to-stroma ratio is a characteristic of this entity [Figure 8]b. The atypical glands must be distributed throughout the tissue sampled.
Figure 8: (a) Endometrial hyperplasia without atypia showing a “Swiss-cheese” appearance. An increased gland-to-stroma ratio is seen, with dilated and branching glands (HE stain, ×10). (b) Cystic glands seen throughout the field (HE stain, ×20). (c) Normal proliferative endometrium for comparison (HE stain, ×5)

Click here to view


This term now also includes the earlier entity of complex hyperplasia which is characterized by increasing glandular architectural complexity, but without nuclear atypia and a lesser risk of progression to malignancy. Progression to endometrial carcinoma occurs in 1%–3% of women with hyperplasia without atypia.[8]

Endometrial atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia

EAH/EIN is characterized by a crowded glandular architecture distinct from surrounding endometrium or entrapped glands, with atypical nuclear features distinct from the background endometrium or entrapped normal glands [Figure 9].[8] The abnormal focus should have a linear dimension more than 1 mm for making a diagnosis on endometrial biopsies and would translate to half the size of a low-power (×10) magnification.[13]
Figure 9: Endometrial hyperplasia with atypia (endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia) showing closely packed, back-to-back glands with scant intervening stroma. The cells show atypical and rounded nuclei with prominent nucleoli (red arrow) (HE stain, ×20)

Click here to view


Initially termed “endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia” (2000), the term was modified to “endometrioid” in the WHO 2014 to better reflect its specific association with endometrioid carcinoma (EC).[13]

The European Working Group (EWG) had also developed a classification for endometrial proliferative lesions. According to the EWG classification, simple and complex hyperplasia without atypia was referred to as “hyperplasia,” while atypical hyperplasia and well-differentiated ECs were combined into a single category designated “endometrial neoplasia.”[13] One-quarter to one-third of EAH/EIN will have cancer at immediate hysterectomy or during the 1st year of follow-up.[8]

Endometrioid carcinoma

EC is characterized by increasing glandular complexity with glandular, papillary, and solid architecture of endometrioid glands. On biopsies, EC is differentiated from EIN by (1) stromal invasion defined by a confluent glandular, cribriform, or maze-like pattern, (2) a desmoplastic stroma, or (3) a complex papillary/villoglandular architecture [Figure 10].[8] A size criterion has also been described, the confluent growth being extensive enough to involve at least one-half of a low-power (×4) field, a distance of 2.0 mm [Figure 10]a. Brisk mitotic activity is generally seen in the atypical glands [Figure 10]b.[14] In resection specimens, invasion into the underlying myometrium is usually seen [Figure 11].
Figure 10: (a) Endometrial biopsy showing confluent glandular proliferation. This confluent growth measured more than 2 mm (HE stain, ×0.5). (b) Atypical glands showing brisk mitoses (blue arrows) (HE stain, ×20)

Click here to view
Figure 11: (a) Gross photograph of a hysterectomy showing an endometrial growth on the right lateral wall (red arrow). (b) Endometrioid carcinoma showing myometrial invasion (yellow arrow) (HE stain, ×5). (c) Squamous morules (black arrow) in a case of endometrial carcinoma are metaplastic and not considered while grading the tumor (HE stain, ×10). (d) Neoplastic endometrial glands invading the myometrium (blue arrow) (HE stain, ×10)

Click here to view


In the recent WHO classification, a two-tier grading system has been recommended, where grades 1 and 2 are labeled as low grade while grade 3 is high grade.[8]

Four molecular subtypes with distinct prognoses are described: (1) POLE ultramutated, (2) mismatch repair–deficient, (3) p53 mutant [Figure 12], and (4) no specific molecular profile EC [Table 1].[8] A limited panel of immunohistochemistry and POLE mutation analysis is useful in assessing prognosis in the grade 3 ECs. Molecular signatures also show carcinosarcoma to be an aggressive variant of endometrial carcinoma arising from epithelial–mesenchymal transition, rather than a mixed epithelial and mesenchymal neoplasm, and are included as a type of endometrial carcinoma in the new WHO 2020 [Figure 13].[8]
Figure 12: (a) Photomicrograph of a case of endometrioid carcinoma showing high-grade features, characterized by solid nests (blue arrow) with surrounding desmoplastic stroma (HE stain, ×10). (b) On immunohistochemistry, this tumor showed a diffuse, strong nuclear positivity for ER (IHC, ×20 for ER). (c) p53 also showed strong nuclear positivity in more than 75% of cells, consistent with mutant phenotype (IHC, ×10 for p53). (d) p16 showed a patchy positivity (IHC, ×10 for p16). This immunohistochemical pattern is diagnostic of an endometrioid carcinoma, p53-mutant molecular subtype

Click here to view
Table 1: Molecular subtypes of endometrioid carcinoma

Click here to view
Figure 13: (a) Gross photograph of a hysterectomy showing a fleshy polypoidal growth entirely filling the cavity (blue arrow). (b) Photomicrograph from the same case showing carcinomatous (blue arrow) and sarcomatous elements (red arrow), infiltrating the myometrium indicating a carcinosarcoma (HE stain, ×10). (c) The tumor shows marked nuclear pleomorphism (blue arrows). Abnormal and brisk mitoses are seen in the tumor (yellow arrows) (HE stain, ×20)

Click here to view


Other types of endometrial carcinoma

Serous carcinoma (10%) [Figure 14], clear cell carcinoma (<10%), undifferentiated and dedifferentiated carcinomas, mixed carcinoma, carcinosarcoma, rarer types such as mesonephric adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and primary gastric type mucinous carcinoma are also encountered in the postmenopausal endometrium. Immunohistochemistry with a panel of antibodies is helpful in typing.[8]
Figure 14: (a) Serous carcinoma characterized by a papillary growth pattern with fibrovascular cores (blue arrow) and hierarchical, complex branching (yellow arrow) (HE stain, ×2). (b) Myometrial invasion (arrow) in a case of serous carcinoma (HE stain, ×5). (c) The papillae are lined by markedly atypical cells showing hyperchromatic and pleomorphic nuclei with multiple mitoses, including atypical ones (arrows) (HE stain, ×40)

Click here to view


To summarize, the endometrium at menopause may be inactive but is home to a myriad of neoplastic and nonneoplastic pathologies. Therefore, a careful, thorough histopathological examination in correlation with clinical evaluation is essential for proper diagnosis and management of these conditions.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
McCluggage GW. Benign diseases of the endometrium. In: Kurman RJ, Ellenson LH, Ronnett BM, editors. Blaustein's Pathology of the Female Genital Tract. 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2011.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Hapangama DK, Bulmer JN. Pathophysiology of heavy menstrual bleeding. Womens Health (Lond) 2016;12:3-13.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Dallenbach-Hellweg G, Schmidt D, Dallenbach F. Atlas of Endometrial Histopathology. 3rd ed. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2010. Chapter 3, normal endometrium. p. 7-12.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Murdock TA, Veras EF, Kurman RJ, Mazur MT. Diagnosis of Endometrial Biopsies and Curettings. 3rd ed. Switzerland AG: Springer Nature; 2019. Chapter 5, abnormal uterine bleeding. p. 132-3.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Smith PP, O'Connor S, Gupta J, Clark TJ. Recurrent postmenopausal bleeding: A prospective cohort study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014;21:799-803.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Dreisler E, Stampe Sorensen S, Ibsen PH, Lose G. Prevalence of endometrial polyps and abnormal uterine bleeding in a Danish population aged 20-74 years. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:102-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Nijkang NP, Anderson L, Markham R, Manconi F. Endometrial polyps: Pathogenesis, sequelae and treatment. SAGE Open Med [2050312119848247]. 2019;7:[about 12 p.]. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2050312119848247. [cited 2021 Dec 19].  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Matias-Guiu X, Oliva E, McCluggage WG, Nucci MR, Olivia E. Tumours of the uterine corpus. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Female Genital Tumours (WHO Classification of Tumours). 5th ed., Vol. 4. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); 2020.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Murdock TA, Veras EF, Kurman RJ, Mazur MT. Diagnosis of Endometrial Biopsies and Curettings. 3rd ed. Switzerland AG: Springer Nature; 2019. Chapter 8, polyps. p. 207.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Kendall BS, Ronnett BM, Isacson C, Cho KR, Hedrick L, Diener-West M, et al. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, and well-differentiated carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1998;22:1012-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Bergeron C, Nogales FF, Masseroli M, Abeler V, Duvillard P, Müller-Holzner E, et al. A multicentric European study testing the reproducibility of the WHO classification of endometrial hyperplasia with a proposal of a simplified working classification for biopsy and curettage specimens. Am J Surg Pathol 1999;23:1102-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Zaino R, Carinelli SG, Ellenson LH, Eng C, Katabuchi H, Konishi I, et al. Epithelial tumours and precursors. In: Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington S, Young RH, editors. WHO Classification of Female Genital Tumours. 4th ed. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); 2014.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Murdock TA, Veras EF, Kurman RJ, Mazur MT. Diagnosis of Endometrial Biopsies and Curettings. 3rd ed. Switzerland AG: Springer Nature; 2019. Chapter 9, precursors of endometrial carcinoma. p. 225-60.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Murdock TA, Veras EF, Kurman RJ, Mazur MT. Diagnosis of Endometrial Biopsies and Curettings. 3rd ed. Switzerland AG: Springer Nature; 2019. Chapter 10, endometrial carcinoma. p. 261-320.  Back to cited text no. 14
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11], [Figure 12], [Figure 13], [Figure 14]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Embryology and A...
   Proliferative Phase
    Disordered Proli...
   Atrophy
    Postmenopausal E...
   Endometrial Polyps
    Adenomyomatous P...
    Endometrial Hype...
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed860    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded81    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal