Journal of Mid-life Health Journal of Mid-life Health
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions | Online submission | Subscribe | Advertise Users Online: 313  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 




 
 Table of Contents 
EDITORIAL
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 3-4  

Journal of Mid-life Health - A symphony


1 Gynaecologist, Departments of Gynaecology, Tanvir Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
2 Department of Pharmacology GMC, Jammu, J&K, India

Date of Submission29-Mar-2022
Date of Decision01-Apr-2022
Date of Acceptance05-Apr-2022
Date of Web Publication2-May-2022

Correspondence Address:
Meeta Meeta
Gynaecologist, Departments of Gynaecology, Tanvir Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jmh.jmh_73_22

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Meeta M, Tandon VR. Journal of Mid-life Health - A symphony. J Mid-life Health 2022;13:3-4

How to cite this URL:
Meeta M, Tandon VR. Journal of Mid-life Health - A symphony. J Mid-life Health [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 3];13:3-4. Available from: https://www.jmidlifehealth.org/text.asp?2022/13/1/3/344574







“Work is what you are paid to do; a hobby is for your pleasure.”[1]

This statement aptly describes a reviewer. A special appreciation and thank you to the reviewers for being a part of our journey as editors. To create a perfect symphony, the bandmaster faces his team with the back to the audience; in a journal, the editor faces the audience, and the team of reviewers has their back to the authors and readers. The reviewers are vital for the journal's performance to increase the quality of the article and the turnaround time of the article. The Journal of Midlife Health follows the “double-blinded” peer-review process wherein the authors and reviewers are unaware of each other's identity.[2]

A special thanks to the researchers for submitting work to our journal, and like to hear more from you. We regret we cannot accommodate all submitted articles.

The editorial board is an integral part of the journey, and a special thanks to the co-opted members Dr. Ajay Gajanan Phatak, Dr. Venkat N. Vangaveti, and Dr. Tanvir Tanvir for their valuable inputs. We appreciate the time given for the constructive input, which helped make crucial decisions, and we thoroughly enjoyed the debates.

Apart from review articles, viewpoints, and commentaries, we had two exciting series, one on pictorial review on the endometrium and the other on gender bias in diseases. We thank the invited authors for taking the time to write on subjects that have enhanced readership.

Finally, Mr. Sandeep Chugh and the team from the publisher Wolters Kluwer have gone beyond their call of duty to give us quality service.

Reviewers and Invited Authors are listed alphabetically.

Reviewers: Atul Munshi, Ashwini Gandhi, Ambuja Choranur, Anita Kant, Anupama Shahid, Ajay G. Phatak, Atul Munshi, Jagmeet Madan, J. B. Sharma, Jyothi Unni, Kanharam Patel, Lakshmi Ratna, Leela Digumarti, Maninder Ahuja, Naveen Kumar, Navneet Takkar, Neelam Aggarwal, Neerja Goel, Niraja Chawla, Prabhat Agrawal, Prasun Deb, Parul Kotdawala, Poonam Goel, Priyanka Gorukanti, Purnima Nagaraj, Rakesh Sahay, Ranjana Sharma, Reeti Mehra, Ruchika Garg, Sai Praveen Haranath, Sanjay Kalra, Santosh Radhakrishna, Seema Sharma, Sharad Kumar, Sudha Sharma, Sunila Khandelwal, Sushma Baxi, Tanvir Tanvir, Thomas V. Paul, Tripura Sundari, Usha Saraiya, Usha Poli, URK, Veena Kaul, Venkat Vangaveti, Yashodhara Pardeep.

Invited Authors: International: Ajay Rane, Australia; Anna Fenton, New Zealand; Camil Castelo, Branco, Spain; Cristina Ros, Spain; Eduard Mension, Spain; Inmaculada Alonso, Spain; Isabel Matas, Spain; Marta Tortajada, Spain; Laura Ribera, Spain; Sandhya Gupta, Australia; Sergio Haimovich, Spain; Sònia Anglès‑Acedo, Spain; Sílvia Gómez, Spain. India: Aditya D. Kulkarni; Ajay Gajanan Phatak, Akhil Mahajan, Annil Mahajan, Aniruddha Pratap Singh, Apurva, Arshi Syal, Ashok Vaidya, Atul Munshi, C. V. Harinarayan, Devangi Munshi, Duru Shah, Kripa Elizabeth Cherian, K. Padma, Leela Digumarti, Madhavi Nori, K. Madhukar Reddy, Mamata Deenadayal, Meenakshi Swain, Milind Telang, Naval Kishore Vikram, Neelam Agarwal, Neha Mahajan, Nirmala Vaze, K. Nilay Reddy, Nitin Kapoor, Padma Kurada, Piyush Ranjan, Rama Vaidya, Rakesh Sahay, Raman Marwah, Sabahat Rasool, Sai Praveen Haranath, Sandhya Gupta, Sanjay Kalra, Saurabh Arora, Shailesh Desai, Srinivas Thati, Sudha Sharma, Tanvir Tanvir, Thomas Vizhalil Paul.



 
   References Top

1.
Wilner AN. Peer Review: Work or Hobby? Medscape; November 09, 2017.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
MacAuley D. The role of the manuscript assessor. In: Hall GM, editor. How to Write a Paper. 5th ed. UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2013. p. 102-14.  Back to cited text no. 2
    




 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1010    
    Printed38    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded111    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal